Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Pathway Home
Population Covered By The Guidance
This pathway provides guidance on imaging patients with suspected or known abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Date reviewed: August 2015
Date of next review: April 2023
Published: March 2016
Quick User Guide
Move the mouse cursor over the PINK text boxes inside the flow chart to bring up a pop up box with salient points.
Clicking on the PINK text box will bring up the full text.
The relative radiation level (RRL) of each imaging investigation is displayed in the pop up box.
SYMBOL | RRL | EFFECTIVE DOSE RANGE |
![]() |
None | 0 |
![]() |
Minimal | < 1 millisieverts |
![]() |
Low | 1-5 mSv |
![]() |
Medium | 5-10 mSv |
![]() |
High | >10 mSv |
Images
Teaching Points
Teaching Points
- Physical examination has a moderate sensitivity for the detection of AAA
- Ultrasound is highly accurate in detecting the presence or absence of AAA
- Depending on the size of the aneurysm, further management is based on repeat ultrasounds at variable intervals or referral for surgical intervention (AAA >5cm)
- CT angiography allows evaluation of the anatomy of the abdominal aortic aneurysm and associated structures prior to elective surgical repair
References
References
Date of literature search: August 2015
The search methodology is available on request. Email
References are graded from Level I to V according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Levels of Evidence. Download the document
- Moll FL, Powell JT, Fraedrich G, Verzini F, Haulon S, Waltham M, et al. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41 Suppl 1:S1-s58. (Guidelines). View the reference
- RESCAN Collaborators, Bown MJ, Sweeting MJ, Brown LC, Powell JT, Thompson SG. Surveillance intervals for small abdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013;309(8):806-13. (Level I evidence). View the reference
- Brady AR, Thompson SG, Fowkes FG, Greenhalgh RM, Powell JT. Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion: risk factors and time intervals for surveillance. Circulation. 2004;110(1):16-21. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Ballard DJ, Jordan WD, Jr., Blebea J, et al. Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair. JAMA. 2002;287(22):2968-72. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Powell JT, Gotensparre SM, Sweeting MJ, Brown LC, Fowkes FG, Thompson SG. Rupture rates of small abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41(1):2-10. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- The United Kingdom Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Long-term outcomes of immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(19):1445-52. (Level I evidence). View the reference
- Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR, Reinke DB, Littooy FN, Acher CW, et al. Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(19):1437-44. (Level I evidence). View the reference
- Pleumeekers HJ, Hoes AW, Mulder PG, van der Does E, Hofman A, Lameris JS, et al. Differences in observer variability of ultrasound measurements of the proximal and distal abdominal aorta. J Med Screen. 1998;5(2):104-8. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Norman PE, Powell JT. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: the prognosis in women is worse than in men. Circulation. 2007;115(22):2865-9. (Review article). View the reference
- Powell JT, Sweeting MJ, Brown LC, Gotensparre SM, Fowkes FG, Thompson SG. Systematic review and meta-analysis of growth rates of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg. 2011;98(5):609-18. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Wild JB, Stather PW, Biancari F, Choke EC, Earnshaw JJ, Grant SW, et al. A multicentre observational study of the outcomes of screening detected sub-aneurysmal aortic dilatation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;45(2):128-34. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Fink HA, Lederle FA, Roth CS, Bowles CA, Nelson DB, Haas MA. The accuracy of physical examination to detect abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(6):833-6. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Kuhn M, Bonnin RL, Davey MJ, Rowland JL, Langlois SL. Emergency department ultrasound scanning for abdominal aortic aneurysm: accessible, accurate, and advantageous. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;36(3):219-23. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Fleming C, Whitlock EP, Beil TL, Lederle FA. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a best-evidence systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(3):203-11. (Level I evidence). View the reference
- Burrill J, Dabbagh Z, Gollub F, Hamady M. Multidetector computed tomographic angiography of the cardiovascular system. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2007;83(985):698-704. (Review article). View the reference
- Hellinger JC. Endovascular repair of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms: pre- and postprocedural imaging. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;8(1):2-15. (Review article). View the reference
- Budovec JJ, Pollema M, Grogan M. Update on multidetector computed tomography angiography of the abdominal aorta. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010;48(2):283-309, viii. (Review article). View the reference
Information for Consumers
Information for Consumers
Information from this website |
Information from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists’ website |
Consent to Procedure or Treatment Radiation Risks of X-rays and Scans Computed Tomography (CT) Angiography |
Contrast Medium (Gadolinium versus Iodine) Iodine-Containing Contrast Medium Radiation Risk of Medical Imaging During Pregnancy Radiation Risk of Medical Imaging for Adults and Children |
File Formats
Some documents for download on this website are in a Portable Document Format (PDF). To read these files you might need to download Adobe Acrobat Reader.