Pathway
Pathway Diagram

Images
Image Gallery
Note: These images open in a new page |
|
1 |
 |
Benign Oesophageal Stricture
Image 1 (Barium Swallow): Hiatus hernia with a benign oesophageal stricture (arrow).
|
2 |
 |
Leiomyoma
Image 2 (Barium Swallow): Rounded lesion in the mid oesophagus, characteristic of a leiomyoma.
|
3 |
 |
Cricopharyngeal Diverticulum
Image 3 (Barium Swallow): Demonstrates a cricopharyngeal diverticulum (Zenker's).
|
4a |
 |
Oesophageal Carcinoma
Image 4a and 4b (Barium Swallow): Malignant stricture located at the junction of the middle and distal thirds of the oesophagus, over a length of 2-3cm (arrow). Immediately distal to this is a segment of normal calibre oesophagus, followed by a further segment of narrowing immediately proximal to the gastro-oesophageal junction which has herniated above the diaphragm.
|
4b |
 |
5a |
 |
Oesophageal Carcinoma
Image 5a: Arising at the junction from the oesophagus and stomach is a large ulcerating tumour with heaped-up edges and central necrosis.
|
5b |
 |
Image 5b (H&E, x2.5) and 5c (H&E, x10): Histological sections of a poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. There are sheets and nests of malignant squamous cells infiltrating through the oesophageal wall. Note the extensive lymphovascular space invasion (arrows). The cells demonstrate marked nuclear atypia with frequent mitotic figures at high power.
|
5c |
 |
6a |
 |
Achalasia
Image 6a and 6b (Barium Swallow): Demonstrates a dilated oesophagus with an air fluid level. There is intermittent opening of the gastro-oesophageal junction due to cardiospasms. The delayed film (Image 6b) shows persisting residue in the oesophagus.
|
6b |
 |
Teaching Points
Teaching Points
- Clinical history is important for differentiating between oropharyngeal and oesophageal dysphagia
- Contrast swallow and endoscopy are complementary in the assessment of oesophageal dysphagia
- There is no hard evidence which of these tests should be performed first
- If there is a high pre-test probability of malignancy, it is reasonable to perform endoscopy first
- If there is a lower pre-test probability of malignancy, a contrast swallow may be performed first including assessment of the oropharyngeal phase of swallowing dependant on the history
- VFSS and FEES are both appropriate initial investigations for oropharyngeal dysphagia; they are complementary investigations
- Consider Functional Gastrointestinal Disorder (FGID) globus if the criteria are met (according to ROME 3), if met then no routine imaging is usually required
- If in the clinical assessment of suspected globus other symptoms are apparent then further investigation is required
hs1
Dysphagia
Causes of dysphagia can be congenital, acquired, functional or iatrogenic and include:
1
- Benign
- Peptic stricture
- Schatzki ring
- Webs
- Eosinophilic oesophagitis
- Caustic or radiation injury
- Medication-induced stricture
- Congenital abnormalities (e.g. vascular)
- Anastomotic strictures
- Benign tumours (e.g. leiomyoma)
- Malignant
- Carcinoma (squamous, adenocarcinoma), pseudoachalasia
- Extrinsic compression
- Motility disorders
- Achalasia
- Diffuse oesophageal spasm
- Scleroderma
- Non-specific motility disorders
- Functional disorders
- Patients with structural disorders typically have dysphagia to solids alone, whereas patients with motility disorders typically present with dysphagia to solids and liquids 2
hs2
Oesophageal vs Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
- Dysphagia is defined as difficulty in swallowing solids, fluids or saliva 3,4
- A key decision is whether dysphagia is oropharyngeal and/or oesophageal. History can provide accurate assessment of the type of dysphagia in 80-85% of cases which can help guide further investigation and management 5
- Oropharyngeal dysphagia is often associated with other neurological deficits or clinical manifestations of an underlying disease 6
- Oesophageal dysphagia is often caused by localised neuromuscular disorders and obstructive lesions, including malignancy 6
Features of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia:
5
- Difficulty initiating a swallow, repetitive swallowing
- Complaints of diet/fluid sticking in throat
- Nasal regurgitation
- Coughing, choking or frequent throat clearing during or after eating and drinking
- Drooling
- Dysarthria and diplopia (may accompany neurological conditions that cause oropharyngeal dysphagia). Other neurological deficits may point toward a specific neurological cause of dysphagia
- Recurrent pneumonia
- Weight loss, malnutrition or dehydration
Features of Oesophageal Dysphagia:
6
- Feeling of food “sticking” in the throat or upper chest several seconds after swallowing
- Perceiving a point of obstruction below or behind the sternum
- Painful swallowing may indicate oesophagitis
- Associated heartburn, regurgitation or atypical symptoms of GORD including dyspnoea, chronic cough, hoarseness, throat clearing or sore throat
- Features that are concerning for malignancy include: 5,7
- Short duration
- Progression of symptoms
- Dysphagia more for solids than liquids
- Weight loss
- Anaemia
Globus
- Globus is defined by the ROME III criteria as (must include all of the following and criteria fulfilled for the last 3 months with symptom onset at least 6 months prior to diagnosis): 8
- Persistent or intermittent, non-painful sensation of a lump or foreign body in the throat
- Occurrence of the sensation between meals
- Absence of dysphagia or odynophagia
- Absence of evidence that gastroesophageal reflux is the cause of the symptom
- Absence of histopathology-based oesophageal motility disorders
- Globus without any other associated symptoms does not usually require further investigation 9
hs3
Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD)
- Modality of choice to detect mucosal or structural abnormalities of the oesophagus and proximal stomach 10
- In the assessment of dysphagia, primary role of endoscopy is to exclude malignant cause
- One study suggests endoscopy with therapeutic intent was more cost-effective than an initial diagnostic barium swallow in patients with histories suggestive of benign strictures 11
- A large retrospective series of 1649 patients who had undergone endoscopy as the initial investigation for dysphagia, Varadarajulu et al. found that 50% had major pathology seen on endoscopy (e.g. oesophagitis 28%, stricture 21%), but the overall rate of malignancy was only 4% 12
- Advantages:
- Able to assess mucosal lesions
- Allows biopsies or cytology specimens to be taken
- Allows therapeutic intervention at same setting (e.g. dilatation of strictures)
- More sensitive than barium swallow study for diagnosing of mild reflux oesophagitis or other subtle forms of oesophagitis 13
- Limitations:
- More expensive and invasive than barium swallow study, requires sedation
- Inferior to barium studies for detection of lower oesophageal rings or strictures 13,14
- Unable to evaluate oesophageal motility disorders 13
hs4
Barium Swallow
- Fluoroscopic examination of the pharynx, oesophagus and proximal stomach. A comprehensive examination should be performed, including assessment of the pharyngeal and oesophageal phases of swallowing, assessment for gastro-oesophageal reflux and views of the proximal stomach. This provides functional/motility and anatomical information
- Examination is tailored to the patient's symptoms and usually involves a combination of single and double contrast studies 3,4
- A double contrast study involves the oral administration of a gas-forming agent to provide maximal distension of the stomach and oesophagus, followed by the swallowing of high density barium. It is best for demonstrating mucosal abnormalities
- A single contrast study involves the swallowing of low density barium and is best for detecting subtle strictures, schatzki rings and hiatus hernias
- The use of solids coated in barium may also be used depending on the patient's symptoms
- If there is a history suggestive of aspiration, non-ionic contrast medium should be used first because there are significant risks if barium is aspirated
- Evidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux and the rate of clearing of the refluxate from the oesophagus are also documented 15
- Symptoms of mid/distal oesophageal causes of dysphagia may be referred to the pharynx, but the reverse is rare. However, distal lesions may be associated with cricopharyngeal abnormalities (e.g. Zenker's diverticulum and distal stricture), therefore a comprehensive examination of all phases of swallowing should be performed 3,4
- Overall sensitivity of 75-90% for the diagnosis of oesophageal motility disorders in comparison to oesophageal manometry 13,16-18
- Advantages:
- More sensitive than endoscopy for detection of lower oesophageal rings and strictures 13,14
- Allows assessment of motility
- Less expensive and invasive, and more readily available compared to endoscopy
- Limitations:
- Lack of direct visualisation of mucosa and extra-luminal structures
- Exposure to ionising radiation
hs5
Computed Tomography (CT)
- Wide field of view can demonstrate cause of extrinsic strictures
- Can also allow tumour staging
hs6
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)
- Allows visualisation of the deeper wall layers and perioesophageal tissues
- Useful in assessment of submucosal lesions (e.g. leiomyoma), mediastinal disease and in locoregional staging of the oesophageal cancer 19
- Biopsies may also be taken during EUS
- Limitations:
- Minimally invasive, requires sedation
- Requires skilled operator
hs7
Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study (VFSS)
- Previously considered the gold standard for evaluating oropharyngeal dysphagia. 5,20-22 More recently, the reported accuracy of FEES has been similar to VFSS 23
- Also known as a modified barium swallow 5
- Videofluoroscopy includes assessment of all phases of swallowing, with the patient swallowing barium or non-ionic contrast (barium contrast may cause mediastinitis if perforation is present so water-soluble contrast should be used when suspected). It can involve assessment with various consistencies of bolus, dependant on the patient's symptoms, including solids and liquids
- Can be used to assess the risk of aspiration pneumonia 5
- In many tertiary institutions, radiologists work closely with speech pathologists for the investigation of patients with oropharyngeal swallowing difficulties. Speech pathologists assess the swallow during the procedure
hs8
Manometry
- Mildly invasive “gold standard” investigation for diagnosis of oesophageal motility disorders, especially achalasia 24-26
- Measures the amplitude, timing and configuration of oesophageal contractions and evaluates lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) function 24
- Routine use is not indicated because of the low specificity of the findings and low likelihood of detecting a clinically significant motility disorder 24
- Indications include: 24-27
- When abnormality is not identified on barium study or by endoscopy and correct diagnosis is essential and/or for which localisation of LES is important
- To establish or exclude the diagnosis of suspected cases of achalasia or diffuse oesophageal spasm
- To detect oesophageal motor abnormalities associated with systemic diseases (e.g. connective tissue diseases) if their detection would contribute to establishing a multisystem diagnosis or to other aspects of management
- Disadvantages: mildly invasive, patient discomfort and limited availability
hs9
Radionuclide Oesophageal Transit Studies
- Simple, non-invasive method for assessing motility disorders and quantifying oesophageal emptying, and gastro-oesophageal reflux
- Patient swallows substances labelled with Tc-99m
- Provides information on bolus transit through the oesophagus that can complement manometric data
- Overall sensitivity of 68% for diagnosing oesophageal motility disorders using manometry as standard 16,28
- Useful for diagnosis of oesophageal involvement in systemic diseases, such as scleroderma or autonomic neuropathy
hs10
Fibreoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)
- Insertion of a fibreoptic nasoendoscope to visualise pharyngeal and laryngeal anatomy and to assess secretion management and swallow function 5
- Nasoendoscopy can reveal structural causes of dysphagia 5
- VFSS has originally been considered the gold standard for the assessment of oropharyngeal dysphagia, but FEES has demonstrated similar accuracy in the limited number of available studies 23
- FEES only allows direct observation immediately before and after the swallow, while VFSS demonstrates the entire swallow 23
References
References
References are graded from Level I to V according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Levels of Evidence. Download the document
- Pasha SF, Acosta RD, Chandrasekhara V, Chathadi KV, Decker GA, Early DS, et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of dysphagia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79(2):191-201. (Guidelines document). View the reference
- Lew RJ, Kochman ML. A review of endoscopic methods of esophageal dilation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;35(2):117-26. (Review article). View the reference
- Baker ME, Rice TW. Radiologic evaluation of the esophagus: methods and value in motility disorders and GERD. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;13(3):201-25. (Review article). View the reference
- Levine MS, Rubesin SE. Radiologic investigation of dysphagia. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154(6):1157-63. (Review article). View the reference
- Malagelada JR, Bazzoli F, Boeckxstaens G, De Looze D, Fried M, Kahrilas P, et al. World gastroenterology organisation global guidelines: dysphagia--global guidelines and cascades update September 2014. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49(5):370-8. (Guideline). View the reference
- Kruger D. Assessing esophageal dysphagia. JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants. 2014;27(5):23-30. (Review). View the reference
- Astin MP, Martins T, Welton N, Neal RD, Rose PW, Hamilton W. Diagnostic value of symptoms of oesophagogastric cancers in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(639):e677-91. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Kumar AR, Katz PO. Functional esophageal disorders: a review of diagnosis and management. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;7(5):453-61. (Review article). View the reference
- Jones D, Prowse S. Globus pharyngeus: an update for general practice. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners. 2015;65(639):554-5. (Review). View the reference
- Cooper GS. Indications and contraindications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1994;4(3):439-54. (Review article). View the reference
- Esfandyari T, Potter JW, Vaezi MF. Dysphagia: a cost analysis of the diagnostic approach. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(11):2733-7. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi MA, Patel RS, Mulcahy HE, Barkun A, Jowell P, et al. The yield and the predictors of esophageal pathology when upper endoscopy is used for the initial evaluation of dysphagia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61(7):804-8. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Halpert RD, Feczko PJ, Spickler EM, Ackerman LV. Radiological assessment of dysphagia with endoscopic correlation. Radiology. 1985;157(3):599-602. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Dooley CP, Larson AW, Stace NH, Renner IG, Valenzuela JE, Eliasoph J, et al. Double-contrast barium meal and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. A comparative study. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101(4):538-45. (Level I evidence). View the reference
- Logemann JA. Role of the modified barium swallow in management of patients with dysphagia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;116(3):335-8. (Review article). View the reference
- Parkman HP, Maurer AH, Caroline DF, Miller DL, Krevsky B, Fisher RS. Optimal evaluation of patients with nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia. Manometry, scintigraphy, or videoesophagography? Dig Dis Sci. 1996;41(7):1355-68. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Schima W, Stacher G, Pokieser P, Uranitsch K, Nekahm D, Schober E, et al. Esophageal motor disorders: videofluoroscopic and manometric evaluation--prospective study in 88 symptomatic patients. Radiology. 1992;185(2):487-91. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Ott DJ, Richter JE, Chen YM, Wu WC, Gelfand DW, Castell DO. Esophageal radiography and manometry: correlation in 172 patients with dysphagia. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;149(2):307-11. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Kelly S, Harris KM, Berry E, Hutton J, Roderick P, Cullingworth J, et al. A systematic review of the staging performance of endoscopic ultrasound in gastro-oesophageal carcinoma. Gut. 2001;49(4):534-9. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Scharitzer M, Pokieser P, Schober E, Schima W, Eisenhuber E, Stadler A, et al. Morphological findings in dynamic swallowing studies of symptomatic patients. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(5):1139-44. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Ramsey DJ, Smithard DG, Kalra L. Early assessments of dysphagia and aspiration risk in acute stroke patients. Stroke. 2003;34(5):1252-7. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Barkhausen J, Goyen M, von Winterfeld F, Lauenstein T, Arweiler-Harbeck D, Debatin JF. Visualization of swallowing using real-time TrueFISP MR fluoroscopy. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(1):129-33. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Giraldo-Cadavid LF, Leal-Leano LR, Leon-Basantes GA, Bastidas AR, Garcia R, Ovalle S, et al. Accuracy of endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing for oropharyngeal dysphagia. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(9):2002-10. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Kahrilas PJ, Clouse RE, Hogan WJ. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology. 1994;107(6):1865-84. (Evidence based guidelines). View the reference
- Feussner H, Kauer W, Siewert JR. The place of esophageal manometry in the diagnosis of dysphagia. Dysphagia. 1993;8(2):98-104. (Review article). View the reference
- Savarino E, de Bortoli N, Bellini M, Galeazzi F, Ribolsi M, Salvador R, et al. Practice guidelines on the use of esophageal manometry - A GISMAD-SIGE-AIGO medical position statement. Dig Liver Dis. 2016;48(10):1124-35. (Guideline). View the reference
- Yazaki E, Woodland P, Sifrim D. Uses of Esophageal Function Testing: Dysphagia. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014;24(4):643-54. (Review article). View the reference
- Tatsch K, Voderholzer WA, Weiss MJ, Schrottle W, Hahn K. Reappraisal of quantitative esophageal scintigraphy by optimizing results with ROC analyses. J Nucl Med. 1996;37(11):1799-805. (Level II evidence). View the reference
copyright
Copyright
© Copyright 2023, Diagnostic Imaging Pathways. All Rights Reserved. The information contained on this web site is protected by copyright.
Legal Notice
Please remember that this leaflet is intended as general information only. It is not definitive and Radiology Across Borders can not accept any legal liability arising from its use. The information is kept as up to date and accurate as possible, but please be warned that it is always subject to change
.