Head Injury (Adult)
Pathway Home
Population Covered By The Guidance
This pathway provides guidance on imaging adults with a recent head injury. The Canadian CT Head Rules have been used to formulate the guideline.
Date reviewed: May 2018
Date of next review: March 2023
Published: June 2018
Quick User Guide
Move the mouse cursor over the PINK text boxes inside the flow chart to bring up a pop up box with salient points.
Clicking on the PINK text box will bring up the full text.
The relative radiation level (RRL) of each imaging investigation is displayed in the pop up box.
SYMBOL | RRL | EFFECTIVE DOSE RANGE |
![]() |
None | 0 |
![]() |
Minimal | < 1 millisieverts |
![]() |
Low | 1-5 mSv |
![]() |
Medium | 5-10 mSv |
![]() |
High | >10 mSv |
Images
Teaching Points
Teaching Points
- Certain clinical findings mandate urgent CT head - focal neurological deficit, patients on anticoagulation/antiplatelets or suffering with a bleeding diathesis, penetrating skull injury, depressed skull fracture, signs of a base of skull fracture, < GCS 13 at any time since injury, post-traumatic seizure, unstable vital signs with major trauma
- Patients with a history of loss of consciousness (LOC), amnesia/disorientation and a GCS > 13 must be further risk assessed based on clinical findings. The criteria used in this pathway are based on the Canadian CT Head Rule, which is most widely validated clinical decision making tool. Observation or CT head may be indicated
- The decision to perform imaging on patients with no LOC, amnesia or disorientation and GCS 15 should be based on the judgement of the managing physician after history and examination
- Patients who present without loss of consciousness or amnesia are not included by the Canadian CT Head rule, but there is evidence that there is still a risk of intracranial injury if other risk factors from the rule are present
References
References
Date of literature search: December 2017 - April 2018
References are graded from Level I to V according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Levels of Evidence. Download the document
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK). National institute for health and clinical excellence: guidance. Head injury: triage, assessment, investigation and early management of head injury in children, young people and adults. London: National Clinical Guideline Centre; 2014. Guideline. View the reference
- Besenski N. Traumatic injuries: imaging of head injuries. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(6):1237-52. (Review article). View the reference
- Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K, Clement C, Lesiuk H, Laupacis A, et al. The Canadian CT head rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet. 2001;357(9266):1391-6. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Teasdale GM, Murray G, Anderson E, Mendelow AD, MacMillan R, Jennett B, et al. Risks of acute traumatic intracranial haematoma in children and adults: implications for managing head injuries. BMJ. 1990;300(6721):363-7. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Alcala Minagorre PJ, Aranaz Andres J, Flores Serrano J, Asensio Garcia L, Herrero Galiana A. Diagnostic utility of radiography in head trauma: a critical review of the literature. Anales de pediatria (Barcelona, Spain : 2003). 2004;60(6):561-8. (Review article). View the reference
- Abdul Rahman YS, Al Den AS, Maull KI. Prospective study of validity of neurologic signs in predicting positive cranial computed tomography following minor head trauma. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010;25(1):59-62. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Holmes JF, Baier ME, Derlet RW. Failure of the Miller criteria to predict significant intracranial injury in patients with a Glasgow coma scale score of 14 after minor head trauma. Acad Emerg Med. 1997;4(8):788-92. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Livingston DH, Loder PA, Hunt CD. Minimal head injury: is admission necessary? Am Surg. 1991;57(1):14-7. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Shackford SR, Wald SL, Ross SE, Cogbill TH, Hoyt DB, Morris JA, et al. The clinical utility of computed tomographic scanning and neurologic examination in the management of patients with minor head injuries. J Trauma. 1992;33(3):385-94. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Deitch D, Kirshner HS. Subdural hematoma after normal CT. Neurology. 1989;39(7):985-7. (Level IV evidence). View the reference
- Snoey ER, Levitt MA. Delayed diagnosis of subdural hematoma following normal computed tomography scan. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;23(5):1127-31. (Level IV evidence). View the reference
- Isokuortti H, Luoto TM, Kataja A, Brander A, Siironen J, Liimatainen S, et al. Necessity of monitoring after negative head CT in acute head injury. Injury. 2014:1340-4. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Livingston DH, Lavery RF, Passannante MR, Skurnick JH, Baker S, Fabian TC, et al. Emergency department discharge of patients with a negative cranial computed tomography scan after minimal head injury. Ann Surg. 2000;232(1):126-32. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Levine M, Wyler B, Lovecchio F, Roque P, Raja AS. Risk of intracranial injury after minor head trauma in patients with pre-injury use of clopidogrel. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32(1):71-4. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Batchelor JS, Grayson A. A meta-analysis to determine the effect of preinjury antiplatelet agents on mortality in patients with blunt head trauma Br J Neurosurg. 2013;27(1):12-8. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Easter JS, Haukoos JS, Meehan WP, Novack V, Edlow JA. Will neuroimaging reveal a severe intracranial injury in this adult with minor head trauma?: The rational clinical examination systematic review. JAMA. 2015;314(24):2672-81. (Level I evidence). View the reference
- Ono K, Wada K, Takahara T, Shirotani T. Indications for computed tomography in patients with mild head injury. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2007;47(7):291-7; discussion 7-8. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Smits M, Hunink MGM, Nederkoorn PJ, Dekker HM, Vos PE, Kool DR, et al. A history of loss of consciousness or post‐traumatic amnesia in minor head injury: “conditio sine qua non” or one of the risk factors? Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2007;78(12):1359-64. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. Adult head trauma. 2015. (Guideline). View the reference
- Stiell IG, Lesiuk H, Wells GA, McKnight RD, Brison R, Clement C, et al. The Canadian CT head rule study for patients with minor head injury: rationale, objectives, and methodology for phase I (derivation). Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38(2):160-9. (Methodology article). View the reference
- Stiell IG, Lesiuk H, Wells GA, Coyle D, McKnight RD, Brison R, et al. Canadian CT head rule study for patients with minor head injury: methodology for phase II (validation and economic analysis). Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38(3):317-22. (Methodology article). View the reference
- Stiell IG, Clement CM, Rowe BH, Schull MJ, Brison R, Cass D, et al. Comparison of the Canadian CT head rule and the New Orleans criteria in patients with minor head injury. JAMA. 2005;294(12):1511-8. (Level I evidence). View the reference
- Smits M, Dippel DW, de Haan GG, Dekker HM, Vos PE, Kool DR, et al. External validation of the Canadian CT head rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury. JAMA. 2005;294(12):1519-25. (Level I evidence). View the reference
- Rosengren D, Rothwell S, Brown AF, Chu K. The application of North American CT scan criteria to an Australian population with minor head injury. Emerg Med Australas. 2004;16(3):195-200. (Level IV evidence). View the reference
- Kavalci C, Aksel G, Salt O, Yilmaz MS, Demir A, Kavalci G, et al. Comparison of the Canadian CT head rule and the new orleans criteria in patients with minor head injury. World J Emerg Surg. 2014;9:31. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Papa L, Stiell IG, Clement CM, Pawlowicz A, Wolfram A, Braga C, et al. Performance of the Canadian CT head rule and the New Orleans criteria for predicting any traumatic intracranial injury on computed tomography in a United States level I trauma center. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(1):2-10. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Harnan SE, Pickering A, Pandor A, Goodacre SW. Clinical decision rules for adults with minor head injury: a systematic review. J Trauma. 2011;71(1):245-51. (Level I evidence). View the reference
- Pandor A, Goodacre S, Harnan S, Holmes M, Pickering A, Fitzgerald P, et al. Diagnostic management strategies for adults and children with minor head injury: a systematic review and an economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15(27):1-202. (Level I evidence). View the reference
- Bruce DA. Imaging after head trauma: why, when and which. Childs Nerv Syst. 2000;16(10-11):755-9. (Review article). View the reference
- Orrison WW, Gentry LR, Stimac GK, Tarrel RM, Espinosa MC, Cobb LC. Blinded comparison of cranial CT and MR in closed head injury evaluation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15(2):351-6. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Mittl RL, Grossman RI, Hiehle JF, Hurst RW, Kauder DR, Gennarelli TA, et al. Prevalence of MR evidence of diffuse axonal injury in patients with mild head injury and normal head CT findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15(8):1583-9. (Level III evidence). View the reference
Information for Consumers
Information for Consumers
Information from this website |
Information from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists’ website |
Consent to Procedure or Treatment Radiation Risks of X-rays and Scans |
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Radiation Risk of Medical Imaging During Pregnancy |
File Formats
Some documents for download on this website are in a Portable Document Format (PDF). To read these files you might need to download Adobe Acrobat Reader.