Pathway
Pathway Diagram
Teaching Points
Teaching Points
- Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an idiopathic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system, characterised pathologically by demyelinating foci termed ‘plaques’
- Diagnosis of MS requires demonstration of dissemination in space and dissemination in time as well as exclusion of alternate diagnoses
- The 2017 revision to the McDonald Criteria make several consensus and/or evidence-based recommendations concerning the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis
- MRI can support or replace clinical information for the demonstration of DIS and DIT
hs1
Suspected Multiple Sclerosis
- Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an idiopathic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system, characterised pathologically by demyelinating foci termed ‘plaques’ 1
- In 2009, there were an estimated 23,700 people with MS in Australia 2
- MS affects more women than men, with a female to male ratio reported to be approximately 2-3:1 3
- The prevalence of MS varies geographically, with a reported positive association between MS prevalence and latitude 4
- Other risk factors include: 5
- Infectious mononucleosis (EBV)
- Smoking
- Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels
- Obesity in childhood or adolescence
- Genetic susceptibility: >100 polymorphisms associated with MS, amongst the strongest are alleles of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), particularly the HLA-DRB1 locus
- Clinically, MS is a heterogeneous disorder with several recognised MS subtypes, including;
- Clinically Isolated Syndrome (CIS)
- Defined as the first clinical episode with features suggestive of MS
- A CIS should last for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever or infection, with no clinical features of encephalopathy 6,7
- In a cohort of patients with acute unilateral optic neuritis as a CIS, after 15 years, the probability of developing MS was 50% and was strongly related to presence of lesions on the baseline brain MRI (25% for no lesions and 75% for one or more lesions) 8
- Relapsing-Remitting MS (RRMS)
- Affects the majority of MS patients (85%)
- Characterised by acute episodic periods of worsening neurological symptoms (“attacks”) followed by (partial or full) recovery
- Primary-Progressive MS (PPMS)
- Affects approximately 10-15% of MS patients
- Characterised by gradual progressive deterioration
- Occasional plateaus, temporary minor improvements, or acute relapses are still consistent with the definition
- Secondary-Progressive MS (SPMS)
- Follows the initial relapsing-remitting course, which then follows onto a progressive course with or without occasional relapses
- Approximately half of patients with RRMS will convert to SPMS at the ten year mark and 90% at the twenty five year mark 9
- Radiologically Isolated Syndrome (RIS)
- Brain MRI features typical of demyelination and fulfilling MRI criteria for MS seen as incidental findings in healthy individuals or patients with non-specific symptoms (e.g. headache, dizziness) 6
- High risk for developing clinically definite MS (CDMS), with clinical events identified in 34% of individuals within a 5-year period from the first brain MRI study 10
hs2
History and Examination Suggestive of MS
- Diagnosis of MS requires demonstration of dissemination in space and dissemination in time as well as exclusion of alternate diagnoses
- Clinical assessment is an essential part of the diagnostic work up of MS 11
- Symptoms and signs can be classified as either monofocal (indicative of a single lesion) or multifocal (indicative of more than one lesion)
- Clinical findings can be used to indicate dissemination in space and/or time and a purely clinical diagnosis remains appropriate when MRI and other investigations are not possible
- Clinical features suggestive of an MS attack may include: 12
- Sensory disturbances
- Unilateral optic neuritis
- Diplopia
- Limb weakness
- Clumsiness
- Gait ataxia
- Lhermitte's sign
- Bowel or bladder disturbance
hs3
Exclusion of Alternative Diagnoses
- A diagnosis of MS requires exclusion of other conditions that can mimic MS by their clinical and laboratory profile 11,13
- As MS is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, clear differentiation of MS from MS-mimics is essential to provide early appropriate therapy
- In patients presenting with symptoms and signs of MS, the differential is broad and work up includes a range of clinical, biochemical and imaging tests
- An approach to the exclusion of alternative diagnoses in patients with presentations suggestive of MS has been proposed, and involves: 14
- Exclusion of diseases not likely to be MS or non-MS idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating disease, including but not limited to:
- Vascular: embolic disease, vasculitis, CADASIL (cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts), primary angiitis of the CNS
- Infectious diseases: meningitis, encephalitis, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)
- Metabolic: vitamin B12 deficiency, hyperhomocysteinaemia
- Neoplasm: glioblastoma, lymphoma
- Congenital: Chiari I malformation
- Differentiation of prototypic MS from non-MS idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating disease:
- Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD): differentiating features from MS include 15
- Simultaneous bilateral optic neuritis
- ≥3 vertebral segments of longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis lesions
- Detectable serum antibodies that target the water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4–immunoglobulin G [IgG]) are highly specific and may be involved in the pathogenesis of NMOSD
- Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (ADEM)
- An immune-mediated demyelinating disease that predominantly affects children in response to a preceding infection or vaccination
- Most cases are monophasic
- Lesions are typically located in the basal ganglia and thalamus 16
- Timely recognition of imaging ‘red flags’ in the work up of patients suspected of having MS should alert clinicians to reconsider the differential diagnosis more extensively and perform additional analyses 13,14,16
hs4
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- Since the addition of MRI to the 2001 McDonald criteria to support or replace clinical information, MRI has become a vital component in the diagnosis of MS 17
- The 2010 McDonald criteria have been validated in Caucasian 18,19 and non-Caucasian 20-22 populations and are widely accepted for the MRI diagnosis of MS
- The 2017 McDonald criteria presents recommendations for the diagnosis of MS including several revisions to the 2010 McDonald criteria
- These recommendations include:
- Defining the role of CSF-specific oligoclonal bands in the diagnosis of MS
- Oligoclonal bands represent IgG unique to the cerebrospinal fluid without corresponding IgG in the serum 23
- Several techniques have been developed to test for CSF oligoclonal bands. The current gold standard, with a sensitivity over 95%, is isoelectric focusing on agarose gel followed by immunoblotting or immunofixation for IgG with paired CSF and serum
- Many studies looking at the utility of CSF oligoclonal bands in the diagnosis of MS have shown that it is an independent predictor of conversion of CIS to MS when controlling for clinical and imaging variables 7,23-25
- The 2017 McDonald criteria have recommended that for patients with a typical CIS meeting the criteria for DIS, CSF-specific oligoclonal bands can be used for the diagnosis of MS in the absence of CSF findings atypical for MS 7
- The importance of using appropriate and standardised technology is emphasised
- The DIS category ‘juxtacortical’ expanded to ‘cortical/juxtacortical’
- Pathology studies have shown involvement of the grey matter in MS and different cortical locations have been identified (intracortical, leukocortical and juxtacortical) 26
- Imaging cortical lesions with conventional clinical MRI protocols is challenging 13
- Currently, intracortical, leukocortical and juxtacortical lesions cannot be reliably and consistently distinguished on conventional MRI scans using most available MRI scanners in the clinical setting 13
- Advanced imaging sequences such as double inversion recovery (DIR) and phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) are currently being investigated for detection of cortical lesions 13
- However, availability, limited inter-observer agreement and lack of standardised terminology have limited the use of these sequences in clinical practice
- Hence, new guidelines recommend the use of ‘cortical/juxtacortical’ to expand the concept of juxtacortical lesion in the DIS criteria, by including all MS cortical lesion types and the involvement of the white matter next to the cortex 13
- When available, the use of advanced imaging sequences are recommended to visualize cortical lesions
- Identical DIS criteria used for primary-progressive (PPMS) and relapse-onset MS
- The diagnostic criteria for PPMS have undergone a number of revisions in the last 20 years and have remained distinct from the criteria for RRMS
- Previously, in the 2010 McDonald criteria 11, a diagnosis of PPMS required at least one year of disease progression plus two of the following three criteria
- Evidence for DIS in the brain based on ≥ 1 T2 lesions in at least 1 area characteristic for MS (periventricular, juxtacortical, or infratentorial)*
- Evidence for DIS in the spinal cord based on ≥2 T2 lesions in the cord* or
- The presence of CSF oligoclonal bands
- *Only asymptomatic MRI lesions counted
- One retrospective study found that if the requirement of ≥ 2 spinal cord lesions was changed to ≥1 (asymptomatic or symptomatic), the sensitivity increased from 77% to 84% 27
- Hence, the 2017 McDonald criteria recommends the use of identical DIS criteria for PPMS and RRMS 7
- Distinction does not need to be made between symptomatic and asymptomatic MRI lesions for both DIS and DIT 13
- For DIS criteria in the 2010 McDonald criteria, when the patient's symptoms are referable to the brainstem/cerebellum or spinal cord, then lesions in the symptomatic region are excluded 11
- The exclusion of lesions in the symptomatic region was based on a desire to maximize the specificity of MRI criteria by requiring lesions in 2 sites outside the symptomatic region to establish DIS and to simplify previous MRI criteria 28
- However, the criteria are ambiguous as to whether all lesions in the symptomatic region should be excluded or only the symptomatic lesion
- Recently, studies have shown that inclusion of symptomatic lesions for DIS increases sensitivity and accuracy without sacrificing specificity 28-30
- Inclusion of symptomatic lesions in the DIT criteria has been shown to increase the proportion of patients satisfying the MRI diagnostic criteria for MS to 33%, compared to 30% of those diagnosed without including such lesions 29
- Indeed, deciding what is symptomatic or not is often challenging
References
References
References are graded from Level I to V according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Levels of Evidence. Download the document
- Olek M. Clinical course and classification of multiple sclerosis [Internet] UptoDate; 2017 [cited 2017 December 18]. (Review article). View the reference
- Multiple Sclerosis [Internet] Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2012 [cited 2017 December 18]. View the reference
- Koch-Henriksen N, Sorensen PS. The changing demographic pattern of multiple sclerosis epidemiology. The Lancet Neurology. 2010;9(5):520-32. (Level I Evidence). View the reference
- Simpson S, Jr., Blizzard L, Otahal P, Van der Mei I, Taylor B. Latitude is significantly associated with the prevalence of multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 2011;82(10):1132-41. (Level I Evidence). View the reference
- Olek M, Mowry E. Pathogenesis and epidemiology of multiple sclerosis [Internet]. UpToDate; 2017 [cited 2017 December 18]. View the reference
- Miller DH, Chard DT, Ciccarelli O. Clinically isolated syndromes. The Lancet Neurology. 2012;11(2):157-69. (Review article). View the reference
- Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, Carroll WM, Coetzee T, Comi G, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. The Lancet Neurology. 2018;17(2):162-73. (Clinical guidelines). View the reference
- Optic Neuritis Study Group. Multiple sclerosis risk after optic neuritis: final optic neuritis treatment trial follow-up. Archives of neurology. 2008;65(6):727-32. (Level II Evidence). View the reference
- Weinshenker BG, Bass B, Rice GP, Noseworthy J, Carriere W, Baskerville J, et al. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 2. Predictive value of the early clinical course. Brain : a journal of neurology. 1989;112 ( Pt 6):1419-28. (Level II Evidence). View the reference
- Okuda DT, Siva A, Kantarci O, Inglese M, Katz I, Tutuncu M, et al. Radiologically isolated syndrome: 5-year risk for an initial clinical event. PloS one. 2014;9(3):e90509. (Level II Evidence). View the reference
- Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Annals of neurology. 2011;69(2):292-302. (Clinical guidelines). View the reference
- Olek MJ, Narayan RN, Frohman EM, Frohman TC. Clinical features of multiple sclerosis in adults [Internet] UpToDate; 2016 [cited 2017 December 18]. View the reference
- Filippi M, Rocca MA, Ciccarelli O, De Stefano N, Evangelou N, Kappos L, et al. MRI criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines. The Lancet Neurology. 2016;15(3):292-303. (Clinical guidelines). View the reference
- Miller DH, Weinshenker BG, Filippi M, Banwell BL, Cohen JA, Freedman MS, et al. Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: a consensus approach. Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England). 2008;14(9):1157-74. (Consensus statement). View the reference
- Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, Cabre P, Carroll W, Chitnis T, et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology. 2015;85(2):177-89. (Consensus statement). View the reference
- Charil A, Yousry TA, Rovaris M, Barkhof F, De Stefano N, Fazekas F, et al. MRI and the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: expanding the concept of "no better explanation". The Lancet Neurology. 2006;5(10):841-52. (Review article). View the reference
- McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Annals of neurology. 2001;50(1):121-7. (Clinical guidelines). View the reference
- Runia TF, Jafari N, Hintzen RQ. Application of the 2010 revised criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis to patients with clinically isolated syndromes. European journal of neurology. 2013;20(12):1510-6. (Level III Evidence). View the reference
- Belova AN, Shalenkov IV, Shakurova DN, Boyko AN. Revised McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis diagnostics in central Russia: sensitivity and specificity. Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England). 2014;20(14):1896-9. (Level III Evidence). View the reference
- Huh SY, Kim SH, Kim W, Lee SH, Park MS, Ahn SW, et al. Evaluation of McDonald MRI criteria for dissemination in space in Korean patients with clinically isolated syndromes. Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England). 2014;20(4):492-5. (Level III Evidence). View the reference
- Hsueh CJ, Kao HW, Chen SY, Lo CP, Hsu CC, Liu DW, et al. Comparison of the 2010 and 2005 versions of the McDonald MRI criteria for dissemination-in-time in Taiwanese patients with classic multiple sclerosis. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2013;329(1-2):51-4. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Patrucco L, Rojas JI, Miguez JS, Cristiano E. Application of the McDonald 2010 criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in an Argentinean cohort of patients with clinically isolated syndromes. Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England). 2013;19(10):1297-301. (Level III Evidence). View the reference
- Dobson R, Ramagopalan S, Davis A, Giovannoni G. Cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal bands in multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndromes: a meta-analysis of prevalence, prognosis and effect of latitude. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 2013;84(8):909-14. (Level I evidence). View the reference
- Kuhle J, Disanto G, Dobson R, Adiutori R, Bianchi L, Topping J, et al. Conversion from clinically isolated syndrome to multiple sclerosis: A large multicentre study. Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England). 2015;21(8):1013-24. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Tintore M, Rovira A, Rio J, Otero-Romero S, Arrambide G, Tur C, et al. Defining high, medium and low impact prognostic factors for developing multiple sclerosis. Brain : a journal of neurology. 2015;138(Pt 7):1863-74. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Peterson JW, Bo L, Mork S, Chang A, Trapp BD. Transected neurites, apoptotic neurons, and reduced inflammation in cortical multiple sclerosis lesions. Annals of neurology. 2001;50(3):389-400. (Level III/IV Evidence). View the reference
- Kelly SB, Kinsella K, Duggan M, Tubridy N, McGuigan C, Hutchinson M. A proposed modification to the McDonald 2010 criteria for the diagnosis of primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England). 2013;19(8):1095-100. (Level IV Evidence). View the reference
- Brownlee WJ, Swanton JK, Miszkiel KA, Miller DH, Ciccarelli O. Should the symptomatic region be included in dissemination in space in MRI criteria for MS? Neurology. 2016;87(7):680-3. (Level III Evidence). View the reference
- Kang H, Metz LM, Traboulsee AL, Eliasziw M, Zhao GJ, Cheng Y, et al. Application and a proposed modification of the 2010 McDonald criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in a Canadian cohort of patients with clinically isolated syndromes. Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England). 2014;20(4):458-63. (Level III Evidence). View the reference
- Caucheteux N, Maarouf A, Genevray M, Leray E, Deschamps R, Chaunu MP, et al. Criteria improving multiple sclerosis diagnosis at the first MRI. Journal of neurology. 2015;262(4):979-87. (Level III/IV Evidence). View the reference
copyright
Copyright
© Copyright 2015, Department of Health Western Australia. All Rights Reserved. This web site and its content has been prepared by Radiology Across Borders. The information contained on this web site is protected by copyright.
Legal Notice
Please remember that this leaflet is intended as general information only. It is not definitive and Radiology Across Borders can not accept any legal liability arising from its use. The information is kept as up to date and accurate as possible, but please be warned that it is always subject to change
.