Pituitary Dysfunction or Mass (Suspected)
Pathway Home
Population Covered By The Guidance
This pathway provides guidance on the imaging of adult patients with suspected pituitary mass.
Date reviewed: July 2014
Date of next review: May 2023
Published: August 2014
Quick User Guide
Move the mouse cursor over the PINK text boxes inside the flow chart to bring up a pop up box with salient points.
Clicking on the PINK text box will bring up the full text.
The relative radiation level (RRL) of each imaging investigation is displayed in the pop up box.
| SYMBOL | RRL | EFFECTIVE DOSE RANGE |
 |
None | 0 |
 |
Minimal | < 1 millisieverts |
 |
Low | 1-5 mSv |
 |
Medium | 5-10 mSv |
 |
High | >10 mSv |
Images
Image GalleryNote: These images open in a new page |
||
|---|---|---|
| 1a |  |
Pituitary Microadenoma Image 1a (T1 weighted), 1b and 1c (T2 weighted) (Magnetic Resonance Imaging): There is a lesion seen within the pituitary gland centred to the right of the midline which is of high signal intensity on the T2 weighted imaging and shows slightly reduced signal intensity compared with adjacent pituitary on the T1 weighted imaging. Overall, the lesion measures up to 6mm. The lateral aspect of the lesion is abutting the medial aspect of the cavernous segment of the right internal carotid artery. The superior aspect of the pituitary is directly adjacent to the inferior aspect of the optic chiasm. The appearances are consistent with a pituitary microadenoma. |
| 1b |  |
|
| 1c |  |
|
| 2a |  |
Pituitary Macroadenoma (Cushing's Disease) Image 2a and 2b (Magnetic Resonance Imaging): There is a 13mm right sided pituitary adenoma (arrows) causing deviation of the stalk to the left. Slight suprasellar extension is noted without impingement of the chiasm or optic nerves. |
| 2b |  |
|
| 3a |  |
Pituitary Macroadenoma Image 3a and 3b: Post-mortem specimens showing a circumcribed nodular tumour arising from the anterior pituitary consistent with a macroadenoma. |
| 3b |  |
|
| 3c |  |
Image 3c (H&E, x2.5) and 3d & 3e (H&E, x20): Histological sections demonstrating a circumscribed lesion composed of sheets of uniform polygonal cells with centrally placed nuclei and amphophilic cytoplasm. The features are consistent with a pituitary adenoma. |
| 3d |  |
|
| 3e |  |
|
Teaching Points
Teaching Points
- A pituitary mass or pituitary fossa dysfunction may present clinically in a number of ways such as hormonal deficiency/excess, visual changes or headache
- A detailed history, examination and biochemical screening is required in conjunction with imaging
- MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) with intravenous gadolinium is the modality of choice. It is accurate in the depiction of the pituitary gland, infundibulum, optic chiasm, cavernous sinuses and neighbouring vascular structures
- If MRI is contra-indicated or unavailable, a CT (Computed Tomography) with contrast is an alternative
References
References
Date of literature search: June 2014
The search methodology is available on request. Email
References are graded from Level I to V according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Levels of Evidence. Download the document
- Zee CS, Go JL, Kim PE, Mitchell D, Ahmadi J. Imaging of the pituitary and parasellar region. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2003;14:55-80, vi. (Review article). View the reference
- Davis PC, Hoffman JC, Jr., Spencer T, Tindall GT, Braun IF. MR imaging of pituitary adenoma: CT, clinical, and surgical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;148:797-802. (Level IV evidence). View the reference
- Lundin P, Bergstrom K, Thuomas KA, Lundberg PO, Muhr C. Comparison of MR imaging and CT in pituitary macroadenomas. Acta Radiol. 1991;32:189-96. (Level IV evidence). View the reference
- Mustafa OG, McGregor AM. Diagnosis of pituitary disease. Medicine. 2013;41:497-503. (Review article). View the reference
- Wu LM, Li YL, Yin YH, Hou GQ, Zhu R, Hua XL, et al. Usefulness of dual-energy computed tomography imaging in the differential diagnosis of sellar meningiomas and pituitary adenomas: preliminary report. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90658. (Level II/III evidence). View the reference
- Johnson MR, Hoare RD, Cox T, Dawson JM, Maccabe JJ, Llewelyn DE, et al. The evaluation of patients with a suspected pituitary microadenoma: computer tomography compared to magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1992;36:335-8. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Stein AL, Levenick MN, Kletzky OA. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of suspected pituitary adenomas. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;73:996-9. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- FitzPatrick M, Tartaglino LM, Hollander MD, Zimmerman RA, Flanders AE. Imaging of sellar and parasellar pathology. Radiol Clin North Am. 1999;37:101-21, x. (Review article). View the reference
- Naidich MJ, Russell EJ. Current approaches to imaging of the sellar region and pituitary. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1999;28:45-79, vi. (Review article). View the reference
- Swallow CE, Osborn AG. Imaging of sella and parasellar disease. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1998;19(3):257-71. (Review article). View the reference
- Cho CH, Barkhoudarian G, Hsu L, Bi WL, Zamani AA, Laws ER. Magnetic resonance imaging validation of pituitary gland compression and distortion by typical sellar pathology. J Neurosurg. 2013;119:1461-6. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Kanou Y, Arita K, Kurisu K, Tomohide A, Iida K. Clinical implications of dynamic MRI for pituitary adenomas: clinical and histologic analysis. J Clin Neurosci. 2002;9:659-63. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Nichols DA, Laws ER, Jr., Houser OW, Abboud CF. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery. 1988;22:380-5. (Level IV evidence). View the reference
- Guy RL, Benn JJ, Ayers AB, Bingham JB, Lowy C, Cox TC, et al. A comparison of CT and MRI in the assessment of the pituitary and parasellar region. Clin Radiol. 1991;43:156-61. (Level IV evidence). View the reference
- Kulkarni MV, Lee KF, McArdle CB, Yeakley JW, Haar FL. 1.5-T MR imaging of pituitary microadenomas: technical considerations and CT correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1988;9:5-11. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Cottier JP, Destrieux C, Brunereau L, Bertrand P, Moreau L, Jan M, et al. Cavernous sinus invasion by pituitary adenoma: MR imaging. Radiology. 2000 215:463-9. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Kucharczyk W, Davis DO, Kelly WM, Sze G, Norman D, Newton TH. Pituitary adenomas: high-resolution MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology. 1986;161:761-5. (Level III evidence). View the reference
- Hall WA, Luciano MG, Doppman JL, Patronas NJ, Oldfield EH. Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging in normal human volunteers: occult adenomas in the general population. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:817-20. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Molitch ME, Russell EJ. The pituitary "incidentaloma". Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:925-31. (Review article). View the reference
- Howlett TA, Como J, Aron DC. Management of pituitary incidentalomas. A survey of British and American endocrinologists. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2000;29:223-30, xi. (Level V evidence). View the reference
- Feldkamp J, Santen R, Harms E, Aulich A, Modder U, Scherbaum WA. Incidentally discovered pituitary lesions: high frequency of macroadenomas and hormone-secreting adenomas - results of a prospective study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1999;51:109-13. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Donovan LE, Corenblum B. The natural history of the pituitary incidentaloma. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:181-3. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Connor SE, Penney CC. MRI in the differential diagnosis of a sellar mass. Clin Radiol. 2003;58:20-31. (Review article). View the reference
- Hurley DM, Ho KK. MJA Practice Essentials--Endocrinology. 9: Pituitary disease in adults. Med J Aust. 2004;180:419-25. (Review article). View the reference
- Rennert J, Doerfler A. Imaging of sellar and parasellar lesions. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2007;109:111-24. (Review article). View the reference
- Lucas JW, Zada G. Imaging of the pituitary and parasellar region. Semin Neurol. 2012;32:320-31. (Review article). View the reference
- Famini P, Maya MM, Melmed S. Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging for sellar and parasellar masses: ten-year experience in 2598 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:1633-41. (Level I evidence). View the reference
- Morita A, Meyer FB, Laws ER, Jr. Symptomatic pituitary metastases. J Neurosurg. 1998;89:69-73. (Level II evidence). View the reference
- Abrams HL, Spiro R, Goldstein N. Metastases in carcinoma; analysis of 1000 autopsied cases. Cancer. 1950;3:74-85. (Level I evidence). View the reference
- Pisaneschi M, Kapoor G. Imaging the sella and parasellar region. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2005;15:203-19. (Review article). View the reference
Information for Consumers
Information for Consumers
Information from this website |
Information from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists’ website |
Consent to Procedure or Treatment Radiation Risks of X-rays and Scans |
Contrast Medium (Gadolinium versus Iodine) Iodine-Containing Contrast Medium Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Radiation Risk of Medical Imaging During Pregnancy |
File Formats
Some documents for download on this website are in a Portable Document Format (PDF). To read these files you might need to download Adobe Acrobat Reader.
